This is one of my Oxfam-Bloomsbury St-London buys. I must admit, I was attracted by the cover; it’s sooo blue and beautiful.
The plot is about Caitlin de Burca, a brilliant travel writer from Ireland, who lives in London and is known Kathleen Burke.
She is an interesting character. Very smart, book-wise and career-wise (she won a scholarship to Trinity College and received a journalism degree in London), but she is promiscuous without enjoying sex. Any stranger asks for sex and she just passively gives in. I just don’t understand it. She examines her behavior at various parts of the novel, but I still am lost as to why she does this to herself.
There are many stories within this novel (maybe I should recommend it to my book group?)
- Kathleen’s examination of her life and the return to being Caitlin
- Her interactions with her family, both blood relatives and her circle of friends in London
- Searching for the truth about the Talbot divorce case of 1849. Mr. Talbot of Mount Talbot, near Ballygall, petitions Parliament so he can divorce his wife, Marianne, for not keeping her marriage vows and being involved with William Mullan, who worked in the stables of the estate
- Writing a historical novel about the Talbot case and then finding facts that don’t agree with her version of the event
- Learning more about the Famine caused by the potato crop failures and how it is still in the hearts of the Irish people
As a girl, Caitlin learns about the Famine from an English historian who is examining the remains of the cottages of the tenant farmers and relates just the bare details of the events. She goes homes to ask her parents and gets no answer. She later finds out more at school.
In order to explain her family life (her father always being angry and her mother being quiet and depressed), little Caitlin concludes, “..so I put two and two together, home and the famine, and I used to wonder whether something that happened more than 100 years ago and that was almost forgotten, could have been so terrible that it knocked all the happiness of people.”
An important lover gives her the basic piece of information about the Talbot case, and she starts to research it about 25 years later, as a result of a sad event.
When she goes home, she realizes about all the prejudices that she had to deal with in England and how she doesn’t have to worry about being singled out as Irish in her homeland.
(Since the US is the land of immigrants and the Irish came over relatively early, the Irish here don’t have the same problems as Caitlin, although in the beginning, they didn’t have a great time either. Many of the Irish descendants hold positions of power in this country; it’s the Hispanic immigrants that are the source of outrage these days. And, if a lass or lad now has an Irish accent, he or she will be surrounded by admirers. So, this piece of information surprised me, although I understand the role that the IRA played in not endearing themselves to the Brits.)
In the novel, William Mullan sets sail to come to New Orleans. Everyone assumes that all the Irish people stayed in NYC, but it’s not true. There was a great need for labor in the 1840s and 1850s for the dangerous work of draining swamps to build roads, levees, and bridges. The slaves didn’t work in this capacity.A lot of Irish and German immigrants died in taming New Orleans.
At work, I have access to a city directory from the 1850s. I found a William Mullen, whose occupation is a painter. Could it be the same William from the Talbot case, which is a real case? The spelling of the last name varies by one letter, though. And, would he have changed his last name on the voyage to New Orleans or would he have kept it? The mystery may never be solved.
When Caitlin is back in Ireland, you can feel the openness of the land, because the people were either chased away or died. You also understand how this Famine destroyed the civilization.
I don’t understand the workhouse. I need to research this topic.
Once I started this novel, I couldn’t put it down. The economics and politics of the Famine were interesting; it kind of reminds me of the indifference of the current administration during the ‘Kane crisis.